Thursday, 3 April 2025

C is for...Crucial ... n ... Change

 


All this month I am writing about aspects of Indian textiles, a quick but captivating dive into the saree specifically, a garment worn by Indians for five millennia. Come with me into the colourful, complex and utterly fascinating world of yarn and thread, of skills and techniques of dyeing and printing and embroidery, traditions unchanged for centuries. Of sumptuous finished fabrics that not only make a fashion statement, but also constitute our cultural and political identity. 


C is for Company 


There are several types of sarees that one could pick for C - Chanderi for one, Chettinad for another. One could talk about the textile hubs such as Coimbatore, the 'Manchester of South India' or Calicut. But...nope, not going there.   


Instead, let's talk about a slightly different C. The company above is the Company Bahadur a k a The East India Company. C is for Colonialism, the struggle for independence and how Indian Cloth was at the Centre of an avalanche of Change.

 

In 1608, when the first trading ship of EIC docked at the west coast of India, this country was a manufacturing hub of world class textiles. India had 25% of the global exports of textiles, profits from which made the Indian Emperor Jehangir the wealthiest monarch in the world. Britain at the time had about 2-3% of the textiles market worldwide. 


The Company introduced calico and chintz to Britain, initially as a sideline from its main trade in spices. However, by the late 1600s, textile goods had overtaken them in importance. Indian textiles proved to be wildly popular in Britain threatening the domestic weavers and leading to the first of the Calico Acts in 1700 - a ban on the import of finished cotton fabrics. 


...also for Clive...n... the Charkha


Image credit


Robert Clive established Company rule in India in 1757 by winning the Battle of Plassey, defeating Nawab Siraj-ud-daula of Bengal. And meanwhile, on the other side in Britain, the Industrial Revolution took shape and the first British textile mills came to be established in the 1770s. With the invention of the 'spinning Jenny,' the power loom etc, the growth of cloth production was scaled up manifold from a cottage industry to commercial levels


Beyond the Atlantic, the American Revolutionary War meant that the source of raw cotton dried up. The British needed both raw materials to keep the mills fed and a large overseas market to sell the finished textile goods.  So naturally, they continued to block the import of finished textiles and instead scooped up raw cotton bales from India to process and flooded the Indian market with cheaper mill made fabrics. 


Throughout colonial rule, British policies kept the local Indian industries shackled. Mill made British cloth was taxed at absurdly low rates whereas indigenous cloth was exorbitantly taxed. Skilled Indian weavers, in the trade for generations, lost their livelihood and were pushed into abject poverty. The entire Indian textile industry was crippled. And so India's millennia long domination of the global textiles market, from the days of Ancient Rome and Egypt, practically vanished in the short space of a century and a half. 


Consequently, the Indian political aspirations for independence - the Swadeshi (swa - self, desh -country; native-made), Swaraj (raj - rule) and Quit India movements, crystallised around the boycott of foreign goods, including mill made British textiles. 


The early 1920s saw huge political rallies in Bombay and Calcutta where symbolical bonfires of foreign textiles were lit as part of civil disobedience protests. The spinning and wearing of 'Khadi'  a coarse, handspun, handwoven Indian fabric, as well as spinning and weaving hubs set up throughout rural India,  characterised the Swadeshi movement and the drive towards economic self sufficiency. The spinning wheel or charkha was the symbol of Swaraj or self-rule, spinning/weaving/wearing Khadi an act of nonviolent rebellion.  In other words, Indian handspun handloom cloth became the face of the Indian freedom struggle. Coarse handspun was weaponised to a tool of political resistance.


Image credit. This was adopted as the national flag in 1933
 and incorporated the spinning wheel. It was replaced by the
 Ashoka Chakra in July 1947 and hoisted on Independence
Day on 15th August of the same year.

When the long march to freedom ended in August 1947, the first Prime Minister of an independent India hoisted the Indian flag in Delhi. It was made of Khadi, the Indian handspun, handloom cotton cloth, its historical weight far exceeding its mere grammage.


Indian flag 1947-present. Till 2021, the
flag was mandatorily made of Khadi,
handspun, handwoven cotton or silk. 



~~~


Did you know about the crass protectionism practised by the Western colonial governments? Something to consider, isn't it? - when contemporary Western nations complain about Indian markets being restrictive and Indian tariffs preventing foreign goods being sold freely in India! 


Do you think WTO should take into account the wrongs of colonialism and the destruction of thriving industries due to shamelessly unfair tax/tariff regimens of the past centuries? Should sectors like the handloom industry in India be compensated for the havoc that colonial governments wreaked and if so, how? 


Thank you for reading. And happy A-Zing to you if you are participating in the challenge. 



A-Z Challenge 2025

14 comments:

  1. Hari OM
    Much of this I knew... and then also learned much more in depth through a most marvellous podcast (which I cannot recommend hightly enough for any interested in colonialist regimes and periods of history... it is simply called EMPIRE and is hosted by Anita Anand and William Dalrymple).

    Your ending questions are very current, given how tarriffs are again rising as a tool of tactics (dare I say tyranny?). The matter of compensations/reparations is a thorny one, given foodstuffs and other items more immediate to daily living are to be affected. It would also depend upon from whom the compensation is sought... Much to mull over! YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you about tax regimes being used as tools of tyranny. I don't think I'd want actual monetary reparations, its too complicated and open to all kinds of nasty manipulation, probably create more problems than it would solve. India can do without reparations. What I DO want is an acknowledgement and a genuine apology. Also an awareness of our history on the part of ill-educated, clueless western leaders who devise these tariff/tax policies. However, I know that is too much to ask of such short sighted, self absorbed leadership.

      William Dalrymple is one of my favourite historians/writers, have a whole lot of his books, one of them with Anita Anand.

      Delete
  2. I did know. I would welcome compensations/reparations but I don't think they will ever happen so I would be happy to wipe out the ridiculous debts imposed on the southern hemisphere that is causing much stress and poverty right now.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That does not seem fair that British weaves were sold cheaper there. Tariffs are a strange thing. Until recently, I didn't understand how they worked. Now I understand how goods pour into our country with tiny tariffs and yet our stuff goes to other countries with huge tariffs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tariffs are ultimately borne by the end consumers, so not good for anybody.

      Delete
  4. I did know. And grieve. I don't know how reparation could be achieved though. Colonolisation brought some dreadful things in its wake.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, the world has still not recovered from that blow while fresh strikes are now on.

      Delete
  5. I knew some of it, but not the beginning. And I watched the weaving video, it is mesmerizing...

    The Multicolored Diary

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you enjoyed the video! Once one witnesses how personal, how masterful the process of hand weaving a saree is, it is hard to contemplate a world without these works of art. Truly distressing to think these skills might die out if we aren't careful.

      Delete
  6. Wow - the cycle of history just repeats and repeats and we never learn. Tariffs...ugh. The history of cloth is mind blowing. You took a very difficult history lesson and gave us an excellent synopsis. In just A, B, C - we've been on quite the learning journey.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is completely astounding and baffling to me that we humans learn nothing from history. So glad you enjoyed the post.

      Delete
  7. I love this theme, Nilanjana! Your posts demand and deserve closer reading than I can give them at the moment, but just want to say that I will be an avid reader from A to Z. Thank you for all that you are offering here, whether it is historical overview or details about a particular kind of weave/style of textile.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you enjoyed reading. See you around the A-Z!

      Delete