Tuesday 30 April 2019

Z is for Zat's all, folks!





Well, hasn't the month just zipped past? Always a mixed feeling to get to the last post...   


Zinga Goshty was Bangladesh’s pioneering pop band, formed a decade before Bangladesh was independent. Here is one of their hit tracks from 1982 – Dhaka, sung by Nazma Zaman on Bangladesh TV. 



The following track is from an album called Beche Thakar Mane (The Meaning of Survival) sung by Nachiketa from West Bengal. The lyrics are by Zulfiqar Russell, a Bangladeshi lyricist, poet and journalist.



Mitthe is from Ekla Prothom, the first album by Zooel Morshed, known simply as Zooel. He is a sound engineer and artiste from Bangladesh. 


And the final track for this A-Z series on Bengaliana - is from Miftah Zaman, a Bangladeshi singer-songwriter and musician with a title called Dujon Dupothe (Two people on two paths) about drifting apart, about divergence. 





Zamindari...under the Mughals and the British...


Zamindar, from the Persian zamin=earth/land, dar=suffix indicative of possession, means a landlord. The zamindari system was first set up by the Mughal emperor Akbar (1542-1605). In those times, the zamindars were tax collectors in charge of the land cultivated by peasants. They belonged to the nobility and were mansabdars (mansab= position in Arabic - commanders in the military with a fixed number of troops, varying from ten to over 10,000. Higher mansabs were granted to the princes of royal blood and to the non-Muslim kings who accepted Mughal suzerainty). The collection rights given to these collectors were not necessarily hereditary, the Emperor always had the final say and could allocate the office to another more favoured nobleman, all land belonged to the Empire. The zamindars were also responsible for certain policing, judicial and administrative duties in their domains.


Akbar put in place a taxation system which was thorough and generally fair to the farmer. Though it was not that abuses on the ground did not happen. But by and large the system was based on the fertility of the land, and actual yield potentials. The tax amount varied from 1/3rd on top grade fertile land to 1/26th of the yield on poor quality land. Extortion and abuses, if complaints were brought, were dealt with very severely. Seeds were made available to the farmers by the state, wells were dug, loans were given also. In the case of droughts or famines, taxes were remitted on a case to case basis. Not necessarily a cushy life for the farmer, but it wasn’t a total write off either, crushed by taxes and the state. This system served the Mughal Empire very well. Consider this, the land revenue at Akbar’s time was Rs 175 million; it rose to Rs 211 million under his grandson Shah Jahan, and finally to nearly Rs 300 million during Aurangzeb’s reign. Things kind of fell apart for the Mughals after Aurangzeb and that is when the EIC made its move on Bengal/India, as we have seen earlier in this series.


Some zamindars came to wield enormous power at the grassroots level and sometimes ran their zamindari almost independent of the Empire. Notable examples of such zamindars were the Baro Bhuiya (Baro=Twelve/Several; Bhu=Land, Bhuiya=One with land) of Bengal, around the Bhati or the Delta region in the late 16th century. The Baro Bhuiya included both Hindu zamindars such as Raja Pratapaditya of Jessore, and also Muslims such as Isa Khan. These formed a confederacy that repulsed attacks by the Mughal Empire itself, through superior use of naval power and strategies. The Mughals were pathetic at naval warfare and the navy was the weakest branch of their defence forces. While any ruler of lower Bengal clearly had to be conversant with a riverine warfare regime – the Bhati/Delta region of Bengal is really more water than land. It was only in the reign of Jahangir, Akbar’s son, that Bengal was finally and properly brought under Mughal control. And incidentally it was during his reign also that the first firman granting the British the right to trade was issued.


Getting back to the Bengal zamindars,  they were great patrons of the arts, built many monuments, promoted cultural, educational, and economic developments, played key roles in the Bengal Renaissance and the First War of Independence/Sepoy Mutiny of 1857. However, they were also known for developing the urban centres at the cost of the rural masses and exploitation of the peasant farmers. Both Raja Ram Mohan Roy  and Rabindranath Tagore, two monumental figures  of the Renaissance, were connected to zamindaris, the Raja was himself a zamindar and Tagore was the youngest son of one. Both were vocal in condemning social evils of their time and advocated for social reform.


After the British gained control, Lord Cornwallis put through the Permanent Settlement of Bengal in 1790's, as part of the Cornwallis Code. This affected life in Bengal on many levels and created a powerful landowning class that initially supported the British. In the Mughal era, the zamindars were functionaries of the Empire reporting to the imperial Diwan, whose responsibility it was to make sure that the system did not tax farmers so as to jeopardise future tax collections.


When the EIC took over the Diwani of Bengal in 1764, it found itself short of trained manpower well-versed in the local customs and laws and agricultural practices. (The setting up of educational institutions to train local Bengalis to serve in the British administration, and also the interest in local languages and systems so that Britishers could run the province, were direct by-products of these.) As a result of this gap, zamindars remained unsupervised and/or reported to unscrupulous/clueless/corrupt officials – farmers were taxed without any thought for local welfare or future income.


Once the British took India, many zamindars were granted/assumed the titles of Raja, Maharaja, Rana, Rai and Nawab, all meaning ruler, king or viceroy. While the British retained the zamindari and its associated systems, they changed the land revenue calculations, withdrew the facility of loans without any thought for the future or farmer. The landlords were given lifelong tenure, the zamindari became hereditary, effectively the zamindar became the landowner. However, they were no longer allowed to maintain their own troops anymore. Under this system, the zamindars were liable to pay a fixed sum to the British, pegged at 10/11 parts of the amount realised from the land, and retain one part for themselves. They were free to set the taxes due from farmers to the zamindari. The zamindars thus brought in a certain amount for the British irrespective of weather conditions, fertility of land or any other considerations. Absentee landlords who bore no burdens of the cultivation but claimed the lion’s share of produce appeared as a consequence of this policy. A switch to cash crops like sugarcane, jute, cotton was forced through at the expense of food crops, ultimately resulting in food insufficiency and famines. No-one, neither the British nor the zamindars did anything for the peasants during famines. Not exactly a great system - what had survived under the Mughals for 200 years, did not complete even a century under the new rulers.


Though the British had sought to create a class of native Indians loyal to the Company/Crown through this system, the zamindars ultimately formed a separate, powerful, elite interest group, caring nothing for the cultivators and often at loggerheads with their British masters. The zamindari system was abolished after independence in the early 1950’s in both Bengals in major agrarian reforms. 



~~~~~~



So. Zat complete’s my A-Z Challenge 2019… Heartfelt thank yous to those of you who came along on this heady trip home, I hope you enjoyed yourselves as much as I did. Off for some much needed zzzzzz now...see you next month! 





Posted for the A-Z Challenge 2019 

24 comments:

  1. Definitely much needed zzzzz. Rest up well and thank you so much for your informative, fascinating post.
    Colonisation is so often a dirty word isn't it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That made me wonder if there are examples of clean colonisation in history.

      Delete
    2. And thank you for your support this A-Z!

      Delete
    3. I can't think of any examples of clean (or even cleanish) colonisation. Which is sad.

      Delete
    4. Ya, me neither. Totally sad.

      Delete
  2. Z for Zounds -quite a lot of lessons in history, culture, music, and so much more. Thank you for your A-Z blog posts and efforts to educate in such a profound way. Wow!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The pleasure all entirely mine. Thank you for reading and your support.

      Delete
  3. Interesting post. Well done on completing the A to Z challenge, not everyone who begins finishes. Quite fascinating, the history, that is. What on earth would make someone think they are the owners of the land and are entitled to excessive taxation? The land doesn't belong to any man but to God who created it.
    Blessings from Geoff through the A to Z challenge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Settled agriculture - once that began, humans stopped thinking of land as belonging to anyone other than themselves. All wars are fought ultimately to defend territories.

      Thanks for visiting and the wishes! Much appreciated.

      Delete
  4. That was an impressive array of 'Z' words with some very interesting information to convey. Excellent series!

    Congratulations on another A to Z accomplished and done very well. You really put some thought into your posts with more information to fill my head which after all of this April's cumulative knowledge from so many participants. My brain is about to burst!

    Thanks for being a part of this 10th A to Z Challenge!

    Arlee Bird
    Tossing It Out

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank yous to the A-Z team for creating the space and all the work to keep it going.

      Delete
  5. Another fascinating post to end your fascinating series with - I truly appreciate all the historical and cultural information you've shared with us. It's fun to come away from the challenge feeling more knowledgeable and curious about a topic, and you've definitely done that for me. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm glad you enjoyed the series, Deborah. Thank you for reading and the encouragement.

      Delete
  6. Great title... and I enjoyed all the posts this month that I've been able to read, although I almost never commented due to time constraints. Well done, Nila!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you liked the title and the posts :) and thank you. Hopefully May will go easier and less crowded for you.

      Delete
  7. Congratulations on completing A to Z! I think you've participated every year I have (my first was in 2012).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mine was in 2014 and I've participated every year since. Thank you for the wishes and the support, for hosting and making the time to visit here.

      Delete
  8. Great posts, it's a very interesting theme. Good job ;)

    ReplyDelete
  9. An exciting theme for the challenge, lots of great music selections, and I learned a lot about the history of a country I did not know much about before. Thank you! :)

    The Multicolored Diary

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for hosting and your support throughout. Much appreciated.

      Delete
  10. So much information! Congratulations on finishing the AtoZ although there was never a doubt you would!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Kristin. Much appreciate your support. I didn't start this A-Z with all my posts scheduled, so it was touch and go in the middle, and April was a crowded month, what with travelling and a local poetry event, but...all's well that ends well, phew!

      Delete
  11. Hi Nila - I've still to read your posts ... and I want to - because you inform us about so much history.

    Obviously you've accomplished lots that month (no longer this month!) ... reading your reply to Kristin above.

    Colonisation is a horrible thought ... and the aftermath is difficult - yet one wonders what would have happened if we hadn't had the industrial revolution, Europe and the Brits exploring the world ... where we'd all be today - very different world.

    The European Brexit team want to send us back to being a colony - a lot of bad blood at the moment - a dilemma for us here. Who knows what's going to happen - or how it will pan out ...

    I will be back to read, listen and take in lots about Bangladesh ... all I can say is - many many congratulations - cheers Hilary

    ReplyDelete